In this post I want to put forth an open question: What is the best way to create open source hardware?
With hardware I am keeping the field open, it can be a whole machine or a piece of it - and addendum. Anything from a tool to an extra axis or pallet loader.
Now why am I posting this question? Well I have too many unknowns and many theories and I think its is time I ask what the MFGx community thinks.
There are many reasons why one would like to create open source hardware, I am going to narrow these down so that I can organize my thoughts.
1. Access: By reducing cost, allowing local sourcing and providing engineering blue prints, access is greatly increased. Not just by shops in the US but all over the world.
2. Control: By building your own hardware, one gains an incredible amount of control over what the machine can do.
3. Capabilities: What is supplied by the mainstream manufactures is no longer what you get stuck with.
4. Cost: A combination of all of the above can lead to substantial cost savings especially in higher capability systems.
I want to hear your comments. This is only the begging, later I want to get into component selection, spindles, machine configurations, performance and features and how to go about defining these.
Picture: Prototype CNC machine being developed in Colombia. 5HP 10,000 RPM BT40 Spindle 18x20x22in displacement.

Don't get me wrong, I realy like the open source hardware. I'm just convinced the CNC machine is not the right product to start with. The CNC machine is relatively easy 3, 4, or 5 axis even. I just don't see the CNC machine as the ice breaker for open source hardware because not everyone wants one. You need a realy cool invention that everyone is going to want and can be made on a CNC. Then everyone will want to build one.
The CNC machine will never be more than a taxi that gets you there.
People want cars and bycycles not the machines that made them.