For the past eight years, Autodesk and MFG.com have quietly and informally supported each other’s position within the manufacturing community. As the recognized standard for 2D design tools and the leading provider of 3D modeling solutions, Autodesk has had a significant and positive impact on productivity gains within the engineering and manufacturing worlds. Over the course of the last eight years, MFG.com has emerged as the leading global online marketplace for the manufacturing economy – enabling designers and suppliers to find each other and work together in a far more efficient manner than ever before. During those eight years, a significant majority of the designs that have been sourced on MFG.com originated within Autodesk solutions.
For those of you already using Inventor, I’m sure you fully appreciate the capabilities and value that is delivered by this amazing tool. I am amazed at all the things that Inventor does, given its relatively low cost. Just ten years ago, such a tool was almost unimaginable for any company other than the largest. But now, a solitary consultant has access to the same powerful design tools as Boeing or GE, at a cost that can be recouped with the first project.
And if you haven’t yet made the move to 3D, it’s time you do. At the risk of being too blunt, if you don’t commit to 3D soon, you run the real risk of becoming technologically irrelevant. An engineer’s value to himself and his customer is tied directly to his or her ability to keep current with relevant breakthroughs, information and tools. Being fluent in 3D will soon be necessary just to stay in the game. A great way to start the learning process is with Autodesk’s Inventor LT offering. LT is a slimmed-down version of Inventor, focusing on single parts rather than assemblies. It also doesn’t have the high-end analysis capabilities as its big brother, but it does leverage the same powerful 3D modeling engine, is easy to use and is fully compatible with Inventor. There is also a host of training tools available and many Autodesk resellers have training programs.
As the world’s leading online marketplace for the manufacturing community, we will help you find a qualified supplier for your designs – at no cost to you. We have a global network of suppliers, across a very broad range of specialties and processes, many of which are sure to match your needs. And while we can help you find the lowest cost provider, it is our goal to find you a supplier that is able to deliver the right balance of quality, insight, timeliness, professionalism and cost. So, remember: “Make something, with Autodesk and MFG.com!”
I find it fascinating that you and autodesk have supported each other over the years. I can tell you from experience, your right. Having 3-D models to visualize the part helps in getting the quote right, and when it comes to programming the part, having the 3-D model to extrapulate surfaces to be cut makes it easaier as well.
Somewhere in the future the paper drawing will go away. and you will be able to load the 3-D image into the software and away you go. or maybe the robot will go and machine it. but never the less the part will be made with blinding speed and accuracy. This new format of 3-D imaging will one day be all you need. The only thing it is missing today is the tolerances. The dimensions are there but what about finnish and accuracy?
It seems to me that if the 3-D format could only convey the tolerances and finnishes of the part it displays it could then break down its final barrier, humanity and culture. If you look at a drawing from another part of the world even if it looks simple something about it is different than your used too. begging for the mistake to be made that everyone is still afraid of and the soul reason why people are reluctant to quote around the globe.
I sincerely believe the 3-D CAD format will one day bring down the culture barrier and when that happens it will be able to convey every bit of information required to manufacture said part without any possible misinterpretation.
I'm still waiting on that day because I'm still worried about misinterpretation from around the globe. Colaboration is not the answer either because it is just as susceptable to misinterpretation as the paper drawing. I realy don't care for talking on the phone with an engineer from around the globe trying desperately to understand them. even if we speak the same language it is still difficult because of the culture.
How much longer do you think it will be before the 3-D CAD format is complete in its description of the part?